Search for: "N.V. ORGANON"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2007, 9:42 pm
By Donald Zuhn --- Schering-Plough Corporation announced on March 12th that its Board of Directors has approved the purchase of Organon BioSciences N.V. from Akzo Nobel N.V. for US $14.4 billion. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:15 pm
., Schering-Plough Corporation, Organon USA, Inc., and N.V. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:01 pm
., Organon USA, Inc., N.V. [read post]
23 Jun 2006, 4:50 am
In re Organon N.V., 79 USPQ2d 1639 (TTAB 2006).an orangeExamining Attorney Tracy L. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 7:28 pm
N.V. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:05 am
The FTC had announced a complaint last November challenging Schering Plough's proposed acquisition of healthcare products company Organon BioSciences for $14.4 billion from Dutch company Akzo-Nobel N.V. because the deal would allegedly harm competition in U.S. markets for the sale of three poultry vaccine in violation of the FTC Act § 5 and the Clayton Act § 7. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm
., Schering Plough Corporation, Organon Inc., and N.V. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:41 pm
Inc. and its subsidiary N.V. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:51 pm
., Schering Plough Corporation, Organon Inc., and N.V. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 5:07 pm
The lawsuit complaints allege that the parties named as defendants, which includes Organon USA, Inc., Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Akzo Nobel NV, Organon Biosciences, N.V., and Schering-Plough Corporation, not only knew about the potential side effects associated with NUVARING®, but concealed those risks from the public, including the FDA during the approval process. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:58 pm
., Inc. of Whitehouse Station, New Jersey Schering Plough Corporation of Kenilworth, New Jersey Organon USA, Inc. of Roseland, New Jersey N.V. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
Pursuant to the N.V. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:29 pm
., Inc. of Whitehouse Station, New Jersey Schering Plough Corporation of Kenilworth, New Jersey Organon USA, Inc. of Durham, North Carolina N.V. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:06 am
The Board addressed a flavor mark in In re N.V. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:25 am
In re N.V. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:22 am
As said, this was put to rest in Re N.V. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:43 am
" Judge Costa noted that “[t]he functionality doctrine is a significant hurdle for any party seeking to protect a flavor as a trademark,” citing the In re N.V. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
The non-citable decision, under the new Board policy, may be cited for whatever value it may have, but it is not binding precedent.In re Organon N.V., 79 USPQ2d 1639 (TTAB 2006) [precedential]. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
Organon, for example, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) denied a pharmaceutical company a trademark in the orange flavor of its pills on functionality grounds. 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1639, at *6–13. [read post]
